|
Farm-at-a-Glance

The Martens' Farm
Location: about 60 miles southeast
of Rochester, NY, on the western shore of Seneca
Lake
Important people: Klaas and Mary-Howell
Martens, Peter, Elizabeth, and
Daniel. Plus Robert Hall (employee/asst farm manager)
Years farming: We've farmed this
farm together since 1991. Klaas has farmed all
his life.
Total acreage: 1500
Tillable acres: 1300
Soil type: Honeoye Lima silt
loam
Crops: corn, soybeans, spelt,
wheat, barley, oats, triticale, red kidney beans,
sweet corn, snap beans, cabbage, edamame soybeans
Livestock: sheep, pigs, chickens
for our own use
Regenerative farm practices:
diverse long term crop rotations that incorporate
legumes and small grains, under seeding all small
grains with red clover, actively increasing soil
organic matter
Marketing: corn & small grains
are sold to Lakeview Organic Grain LLC, our organic
feed business. Soybeans, red kidney beans, and
spelt sold to brokers and processors. Some spelt
is sold as kosher organic spelt. Sweet corn, snap
beans and edamame are sold to processors who freeze
them under brand name labels. Cabbage is made
into sauerkraut and packed under the Cascadian
Farms label. Some of the oats, wheat and barley
are being grown from Foundation Seed to produce
Certified Organic Certified Seed.
|
|
|
 |
September
30, 2003: At the end of August, shortly after writing
our ‘stressed out’ August New Farm column (DEFENSIVE
farming), we took a much appreciated vacation to the Outer
Banks of North Carolina. One afternoon, I left Klaas and the
kids swimming at the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and walked
alone south along the beach toward Cape Point, the easternmost
tip of the United States that juts far out into the Atlantic,
nearly to the Gulf Stream. Off to my right was the famous
Cape Hatteras lighthouse, rising tall and hazy in the shimmering
heat. Up ahead, there was nothing but beautiful empty sunswept
beach, no people, no buildings, no sign of human hand.
As I walked, I became very aware that I was not alone at
all. Small silvery fish and an occasional crab darted in the
surf, rainbow-hued coquina clams and industrious sand fleas
burrowed rapidly in the sand each time a wave receded, sandpiper
birds nimbly played tag with the moving water, their long
beaks pecking constantly at the sand. Indeed, around my feet
was a complex and deft choreography of movement and interaction
that had nothing to do with me. But the real choreography
of the beach, the most important life, lay totally unseen
from my eyes.
Life on a grain of sand
In the April 1995 issue of Discover Magazine, Viginia Morell
wrote an utterly delightful article entitled “Life on
a Grain of Sand.” (www.discover.com)
In this, she describes the strange and wonderful microscopic
jungle of tiny animals and plants that thrive in the seemingly
sterile sand. A single handful of wet sand can contain over
10,000 such creatures, a complex myriad of eating and being
eaten, of movement, of variation and of reproduction.
These are really unusual looking creatures. The meiofauna,
as the tiny invertebrate animals are called, are equipped
with all sorts of odd appendages and body shapes that are
well adapted to this unique environment. The tardigrade, popularly
known as the ‘water bear’ is a mere half millimeter
in length, looking like a tiny piece of silver confetti with
legs and claws. The claws enable it to grip and move over
the sand grains. Some types of tardigrades have suction toes
to hold them in place, while others have a teardrop-shaped
bubbles on the end of their tails to enable them to hover
between sand grains like miniature Zeppelins, grazing on microscopic
algae!
The vast majority of these creatures have yet to be identified
or named. In the Discover article, Dr. Robert Higgins, retired
researcher with the Smithsonian Institute, says “It
is such a rich and complex world but it is one we’ve
barely scratched the surface of. It is impossible to say how
many more species are left to be found and identified. A beach
without meiofauna would be a very different place. Without
them, all the dead material - fish, shellfish, seaweed - that
washes up on the shore would simply accumulate and the bacteria
would build up until the beach became anoxic (starved of oxygen)
and toxic.” Instead, these creatures recycle, decompose,
and in turn serve as food for larger animals, filling the
beach with a constant healthy cycle of life.
When I was teaching biology at the local community college
in the late 1990’s, I used to give this article to my
students to read when we reached the invertebrate unit. Once,
a bright older student came up after class, her eyes glowing,
and she said “Thanks! This article made me realize how
much I never knew existed!”
Life in a handful of soil
As organic farmers, we know that the living diversity in
our soils exceeds this wonderful beach world by many orders
of magnitude. In one teaspoon of soil, there may be over 60
million bacteria, but if that teaspoon comes from the root
zone of a healthy plant, the number of bacteria may exceed
one billion. Bacteria, fungi, algae, actinomycetes, tiny invertebrate
animals, and larger insects and earthworms all thrive in a
complex and ever-changing community of interaction, predation,
competition and balance. Decomposing organic matter provides
nutrients and shelter, living plant roots provide protection
and food. Indeed, living plants exude huge quantities of sugars
and other rich molecules into the soil to feed and select
the most preferable microbes for around their roots.
Slowly we are learning to view the soil as a complex interrelated
whole system and soil ecologists are beginning to understand
what happens when the balance is altered. A healthy soil has
a large diversity of microbes and larger animals, each keeping
the others in balance. When any group of organisms in the
system is eliminated or damaged, the delicate balance of interrelationships
will be shifted.
Our agricultural practices have a profound effect on the
life in the soil. Changes in soil chemistry and physical structure,
nutrient availability, plant species, and tillage practices
can cause microbial populations to shift dramatically. Pesticides
and fertilizers can kill certain types of microbes, causing
populations of others to balloon to fill the void. Diverse
crop rotations, cover crops and crop residue can build soil
organic matter and enhance microbial diversity, while the
lack of fresh organic matter, air or adequate crop rotation
can suppress it.
A recent article posted on the New Farm website (Scientists
link GM crop weed killer to powerful fungus) clearly describes
how totally unexpected results may occur when this balance
is disrupted. Canadian research is showing that soil applications
of glyphosate herbicides can kill many types of beneficial
bacterial and fungi, but tough old Fusarium fungus seems relatively
unaffected. In the absence of competition, the Fusarium will
grow rampantly and infect the roots of many different species
of plants. Corn and wheat, infected by Fusarium, have a nasty
habit of developing high levels of potent mycotoxins, or fungal
toxins, which can contaminate grain. When contaminated grain
is fed to animals, mycotoxins can either be toxic or unpalatable,
or even in minute quantities, can act like estrogen and disrupt
reproduction. All this because of the microbial balance in
the soil.
Dr. Janet Thies at Cornell University is using molecular
(i.e. biotech) methods to define the composition of microbial
populations in different soils and to monitor shifts within
them in response to varying management practices. To us, this
is a wise and good use for biotech, using these powerful new
tools to better understand what is going on in the natural
world and especially to better understand the profound effects
that our human activities have on this unseen world.
Life in the eye of a storm
Much has changed at Cape Hatteras in the past month. Hurricane
Isabel ripped through the islands with a great fury and destruction.
A new inlet has been opened up near where I walked, connecting
ocean to sound and breaking the highway in half as easily
as if it had been made of children’s blocks. Buildings,
powerlines, and other stuff of human civilization were demolished
or damaged. Our favorite fishing pier was shredded. Sand,
always restless and moving, migrated far and covered much.
The Outer Banks will dig out, tack wires back up, replace
broken windows, tear down and rebuild, and life and leisure
will go on, but the beach has been unalterably changed.
The Cape Hatteras lighthouse still stands unscathed. Built
tough and aerodynamically to withstand storms, it stood unwavering
for many years, warning ships nearing the coast of danger.
But several years ago as the beach eroded and the ocean approached
its base, people realized that something needed to be done
to protect this landmark. There were several choices, but
rather than try to build up the beach to keep the sand from
moving, those people in charge wisely chose instead to move
the lighthouse to safer ground. This past month, as other
more modern structures crumbled in Isabel’s fury, the
lighthouse stood firm, an inspiring testament to the wisdom
of human invention that works in harmony with nature rather
than against.
Years ago as a teenager, I wrote a term paper on beach erosion
for a high school oceanography class. As part of the research,
I contacted a professor at Duke University named Dr. Orrin
Pilkey who shared his recent journal paper that showed in
scientific terms why building elaborate structures on a beach
or devising engineering feats to stabilize the beach will
never work in the long term. As Dr. Pilkey succinctly stated,
“beaches move.” That is nature. We humans may
think we are in control in the short term, but nature will
always eventually prevail. Sure enough, that is exactly what
many people now see in the chaotic aftermath of Isabel
Over the past 50 years, our agricultural system has sought
to control, subdue, mold, and kill nature. We have used with
abandon vast quantities of acidic synthetic fertilizers, toxic
pesticides, potent antibiotics and insidious hormones, we
have eliminated biodiversity with monoculture and we have
suffocated the fresh air from the soil with no-till and heavy
equipment. And when this wasn’t enough, we have sought
to redesign the very genetics of life. Short term, many have
thought this is the answer. After all, we recently heard that
the American media assumes that the average American has a
memory span of about 10 days. Beyond 10 days, most people
can remember big events, but not the details and will rarely
question if given contradictory information. We humans like
short term.
I do admit my own hypocrisy here. From time immemorial, people
have been reminded of the folly of building on shifting sands.
But we do so enjoy getting together each summer with many
extended family members, a big rental cottage, a long car
trip, and the amusements and amenities of a beach vacation.
The short term benefits outweigh the long term costs, especially
when the costs are not directly borne by us. Pretty typical,
aren’t we?
However, we really must question where our modern approach
to agriculture and environmental stewardship is taking us,
long term. Where will we be in 25, 50 or 100 years if we continue
to neglect and abuse the unseen but extremely critical life
that lies just beneath our feet and in our water? The United
Nations estimates that by the year 2050, the world’s
current population of more than 6 billion people will increase
to 9.3 billion. How will we feed and provide clean water to
the burgeoning human life on this planet if we do not tend
the unseen life around us?
This month, as we enter the thick of harvest at the end of
another challenging year, we should consider what soil scientist
Dr. William Albrecht once said: “Nature always bats
last.”  |