|
Posted April 20, 2004: The NOFA-NY all-day
CSA School session opened with a packed classroom at 8 a.m.
sharp.
Thick, green three-ring binders loaded with source materials
were stacked high on tables next to the registration desk.
This wasn’t your basic CSA 101 (community supported
agriculture, to the unititiated)—most of the attendees
were experienced organic growers looking to augment their
farm’s existing CSA programs or wanting to start up
new ones. The four instructors at the front of the room had
accumulated more than 40 years of CSA experience between them.
Clearly, the CSA movement has matured significantly since
its beginnings in 1986—possessing deep roots and a substantial
body of knowledge that is leading to rapid growth worldwide.
A wealth of experience
Instructor Janet Britt, for example, headed up a pioneering
CSA farm venture in 1988 after working for a season with Robyn
Van En on Indian Line Farm in the Berkshires in Massachusetts.
Robyn was a founder of the CSA movement in this country in
1986, the same year the Temple-Wilton Community Farm was independently
started in New Hampshire. A group of consumers in New York
State’s Capital District region were inspired by Robyn’s
work and after meeting for a year helped put it all together,
including finding suitable farmland for the farmer and organizing
distribution centers in neighboring areas (since the farm
is located “20 miles from everywhere”). Originally
called the CSA of the Upper Hudson-Mohawk, the Schagticoke,
N.Y. farm evolved into Buttermilk Falls Organic Farm, LLC,
under Janet’s management. The CSA serves 100 families
a year and always has a waiting list.

Scott Chaskey also started out in 1988, with 10 families
at Full Circle Farm on the South Fork of Long Island, N.Y.
In 1990, the CSA concept was presented to the Peconic Land
Trust in nearby North Amagansett on the Atlantic coast. A
hybrid stewardship project was created where the CSA was joined
to a conservation land trust. After two years of positive
experience, the project evolved into a separate entity, with
Scott as head farmer. Quail Hill Farm CSA now encompasses
25 acres of land trust land, serving 200 households. Talking
about the CSA concept, Scott said that it was “a ’60s
idea that worked,” and he would farm no other way. He
paid tribute to Robyn Van En, who died suddenly six years
ago at the age of 49, describing her as the Johnny Appleseed
of CSA farming.
Further south in Accokeek, Maryland, Shane La Brake has been
the CSA farm manager of the Ecosystem Farm since 1995. It
is situated in the midst of National Park Service land directly
across the Potomic River from George Washington’s Mount
Vernon home, 10 miles south of Washington, D.C. The 8 acre
certified organic farm is a project of the Accokeek Foundation
and is designed to train apprentices and sell vegetables through
the CSA. Since the park rules require that no structures,
power lines or cultivated ground be visible to Mount Vernon’s
viewscape, the farm’s fields, solar-powered packing
sheds and irrigation system are tucked behind tree lines and
hedgerows. Historically, the area was extensively used to
grow tobacco for colonial exports, although its clay soils
and high water table present considerable challenges for vegetable
farming.
The newest farmer to CSA was David Hambleton of Sisters Hill
Farm, a 190-member nonprofit CSA in Dutchess County, N.Y.
David was hired by the Sisters of Charity in 1998 to start
the CSA farm on their land; he has expanded the operation
to 3 acres using concentrated cultivation and hoophouse-growing
techniques. David’s intensive growing methods are very
productive, demonstrating that CSAs can feed large numbers
of people from small acreage. In 2003, for example, the farm
produced 65,000 pounds of high-quality vegetables for its
shareholders, as well as for nearby low-income families, through
a project run by the Sisters. David spent a number of years
working on other farms to gain experience before launching
this endeavor. Central to his approach is designing in quality
of life and family-time up front so that the farm doesn’t
end up consuming all his waking hours.
Exploring the CSA option
The CSA Grower’s School was part of the 2004 NOFA-NY
Conference held January 30 through February 1 at the Holiday
Inn Conference Center in Liverpool, N.Y. (just outside Syracuse).
Although the session was set up as a separate Friday pre-conference,
the CSA thread was woven throughout the main conference schedule
Saturday and Sunday. Another 13 workshops covered everything
from “College-based CSAs” and “CSAs for
Low Income People” to “Restaurant-Supported Agriculture”
and “Organizations Helping to Build CSAs”. The
all-day school session, however, allowed participants extra
time to dig deeply into the many aspects of creating, managing
and growing crops for a CSA.
The instructors put together the day’s curriculum by
topic, with well-organized co-presentations. They engaged
in a cooperative dance, frequently exchanging slide trays
on the carousel projector as they took turns presenting differing
perspectives on the various CSA operations. The green binders
were designed to supplement and back up each section and contained
such practical information as actual farm shareholder outreach
materials (including newsletter examples and member response
forms) and internal farm record-keeping tables and crop rotation
plans.
“Is CSA Right for You” was the catch-all title
covering the importance of designing the CSA to fit one’s
location, skills and resources. Just as important is an assessment
of the personal attributes farmers need to make it work. Shane
stressed that the farmers not only need to be competent growers
but must also be good people-persons (or have someone in the
organization who is), as an interactive partnership with shareholders
is key.
Dave said CSA revolutionized the way he deals with consumers.
It allows him to preset the size of the farm he wants and
to generate the income and lifestyle he needs without having
to think further about money or pricing. For those getting
started, he quoted the book Sharing
the Harvest by Elizabeth Henderson with Robyn Van En that
“farmers should start small and grow into it.”
The instructor added that CSA works on the large scale too—with
the 2,500 member Watershed Organics CSA in N.J. and a 40,000-member
“box scheme” organization in Denmark as major
examples.
The team also delved into the “scary part” –
CSAs that fail due to their inability to deal with common
pitfalls. In addition to the lack of grower skills and financial
resources, a dearth of people skills is again at the top of
the list. Ongoing communication problems cause shareholders
to lose confidence in the farmer and the program. The risks
(including the possibility of adverse weather, crop problems
and pest outbreaks) should be clearly presented up front so
shareholders understand what they’re getting into. Realistic
assessments of resources and capabilities are important so
farmers don’t overextend themselves—such as taking
on too many shareholders with too few crops.
The personal challenges to running a CSA are physical (being
healthy and in good shape); mental (making valid appraisals
and continually learning from experience); emotional (having
the ability to handle varying situations); and financial (having
adequate capital and cash flow). There was general agreement
that newsletters are the most important regular communication
tool growers have to reach and retain shareholders. Someone
in the CSA should have the writing skills necessary to generate
regular issues to educate members and keep them connected
to the farm and the farm community.
Farmers also need to realistically assess their land’s
growing capacity. Shane testified to his experience that you
can grow good crops on poor ground but it takes much more
time and resources. The general formula in “Sharing
the Harvest” of being able to generate 20 shares per
acre can be ratcheted upward the more the soil is built up
and balanced. Overall, however, the panel agreed that one
acre of fertile soil is better than five acres of poorer ground
any day.
Building a successful CSA from the ground
up
Section II dealt with “Finding Members and Setting
Up the Organization.” Here a “core group”
of shareholders can play a decisive role in handling both
aspects—there’s nothing like a satisfied membership’s
word-of-mouth to bring in more people. Janet recounted the
story of an enthusiastic shareholder who was instrumental
in signing up many state workers from adjoining offices. There
are numerous working models to choose from, however, from
the single farmer working alone to member run CSAs that hire
a farmer. Member involvement in producing newsletters, farm
events and recruitment tasks can free the farmer to spend
more time farming. Shareholders often possess many valuable
skills and professional expertise that can help out with everything
from advertising to legal work.
The instructors carefully covered the legal structures available
to CSAs. A "sole proprietorship" limits the liability
to the farmer or owner and is appropriate where members and
others do not want to take on the business risk. A "general
partnership" (with a spouse or others) is a way of sharing
risk among the principals without indemnifying others, while
a limited partnership limits the liability to how much each
member invests. The "corporate structure" covers
multiple owners and limits liability to what is contained
in the business, protecting personal assets. There are increased
regulations and fees for this model, however, and owners are
taxed twice via corporate and individual assessments. "S
corporations" also offer protections but income is only
taxed once, as a partnership. Finally, the "Limited Liability
Company," or LLC, combines several positive elements
in one easy package, including liability protection with far
fewer compliance regulations.
Regarding insurance, the team recommended business liability
insurance that is traditionally available to U-pick operations
for covering CSA members on the farm. Some policies can cover
shareholders as “volunteers”. The operating concept
is “due diligence”—a demonstrated good-faith
effort to provide safe conditions on the farm.
“Retaining Members” was the last segment before
lunch. The panel again underscored that newsletters are the
number-one tool for making the CSA experience more meaningful
for shareholders. They can help generate enthusiasm for Swiss
chard in the middle of the summer while keeping a focus on
the bigger picture. Shane said many of his farm’s newsletters
center around three main themes: “What does it mean
to eat fresh, eat local and eat in season.” There was
general panel agreement that the newsletter writing task should
not be left until the last minute, where it can suffer with
conflicting harvesting and packing operations.
Many CSAs offer a work-share option at a lower price, which
helps shareholders to connect more deeply to the farm if they
so desire. Some shareholders only want to “pay and pick
up” and it was stressed that this should be an acceptable
option for everyone. It is key, panel members agreed, to not
make people feel guilty about their level of involvement.
Overall, they said, it’s wise to reinforce positive
messages and not whine too much about the weather and other
vicissitudes in the newsletters. Bartering CSA memberships
with artists for brochures and artwork or for skills such
as welding are another means of meeting the farm’s needs
and engaging members in the larger community.

 |
|
Putting on farm events is a fun way to get people to the
farm and inspire community. Farm tours, speakers, tomato tastings
and seasonal celebrations are all effective draws to the farm.
The instructors also urged the class to think outside the
box. Scott, for example, works with a local restaurant to
produce an annual benefit dinner that is widely advertised
and well attended. The benefit is designed to raise capital
for buying additional farm equipment as well as attract new
members.
The school’s buffet lunch break offered a relaxed opportunity
for participants to mingle and compare notes with fellow classmates.
The instructors were available to answer questions and lead
informal discussions. Then it was back to work and the afternoon
session shifted gears to address crop production considerations.
Farming to feed a CSA
In a segment titled “How to Plan Crops for CSA,”
Dave underscored the importance of surveying the membership—formally
through written questionnaires and informally through conversations
at the pick up centers—to find out what they want. End-of-season
feedback forms are an important tool for determining customer
preferences. The instructors found that the more they could
support less familiar crops like kohlrabi with newsletter
write-ups and recipes during the summer, the higher their
ranking that fall and the more shareholders looked forward
to reconnecting with them the following season.
In addition to producing a diverse amount of crops and varieties,
CSA farmers need to grow numerous successions of the most
popular crops such as lettuce and broccoli so they are available
on a regular basis throughout the season. It is a constant
balancing act for the grower to keep from producing too little
or too much of any one crop. No matter what the crop, however,
a constant commitment to delivering high quality is the key
consideration.
Dave stressed the importance of not relying on memory but
keeping detailed records of crop planting, harvests and quantities
packed for shareholders. A harvest sheet hangs on a clipboard
over the scale in his packing shed, and workers are trained
to diligently log in everything produced. Over the winter
this information is extracted from the daily logs and entered
into a database that can be sorted by crop, seed quantity,
harvest date, rotation sequence, etc., in order to form the
basis for the following year’s plan.
The instructors all said that it is most cost-effective for
them to produce their own seedlings in greenhouses on the
farm, although start-up operations may wish to purchase seedlings
if they are not well set up to do this at the outset. Janet
sows extra quantities of herbs and tomatoes for plant sales
to the public as a means of generating extra springtime income.
Scott talked about reclaiming the lost art of growing in cold
frames as a means for hardening off seedlings and alleviating
overcrowding in the greenhouse. Quality seedlings produce
quality crops. Transplants also get the farm’s production
off to an early start when crop selection is limited, and
they help generate regular crop successions when direct-sowing
conditions in the field are less than optimal.
Another option is to plant some pick-your-own crops for shareholders.
For labor-intensive crops like peas, beans, strawberries and
cut flowers, this option widens the choices to members while
cutting harvest costs for the farmer. Some farms also sponsor
gleaning events where the fields are opened at the end of
the season and any remaining crops are free for the taking.
CSA production and pricing
Next, the panel briefly covered tillage, agreeing that less
is more in terms of promoting soil health and building organic
matter. Scott drew some nods of agreement, however, when he
went into the problems of using a spader, a popular implement
a few years ago. While it can produce better soil effects
than many tillage tools, it operates at very slow speeds and
turns out to be a very high maintenance piece of equipment.
Despite the over-abundant rainfall of the 2003 growing season
in the Northeast, the instructors agreed that an irrigation
system is a necessity in this era of weather extremes. Lettuce
and leaf greens require an inch of water a week, for example,
and overall crop production suffers during periods of drought.
Standard-overhead and drip systems were compared, but the
most elegant was David’s quick-connect zone system.
The water supply is controlled by inexpensive solenoid valves
and zone boxes, allowing him to preset a timer and systematically
cover the entire farm automatically once the nozzles are in
place.
While insect and disease pressure seems to have lessened
over the years on the mature organic farms, weeds require
constant vigilance. David takes a zero tolerance approach
utilizing a bare fallow/stale seedbed approach to exhaust
the weed seed supply in the soil coupled with not letting
any weeds go to seed. Smother crops like buckwheat in the
summer and oats over winter protect bare soil and out-compete
weeds. Rotational planning was also high on the list to break
both weed and pest cycles. Culivation implements of choice
ranged from the Lely tine weeder, basket weeders and propane
flamers, to hand-operated wheel hoes and stirrup hoes, using
the biggest tools first and fine tuning by hand.
All the instructors make use of high tunnels for earlier
lettuce and greens production in the spring and for extending
tomatoes and peppers into late fall. Good airflow is a major
consideration for preventing diseases. Scott provides a winter
share from Thanksgiving until the end of February using unheated
greenhouses (with row covers to further protect crops) and
a root cellar.
The final segment addressed pricing the share. While the
actual farm budget should form the basis, farmers need to
be realistic. Supermarket prices establish a food price relativity
as does competition from nearby CSAs. The bottom line is the
farmer must be paid a living wage with farm costs covered.
Recent studies show shareholders generally benefit by paying
a wholesale price (or less) in return for their upfront dollars.
The resulting “associative economy” is based on
much more than bottom lines, however. CSA goes way beyond
a financial arrangement—offering community, a link to
nature, participation in growing one’s food supply,
a tie to place and a real connection to farm life.

 |
|
The school session concluded with breaking the class into
four smaller groups centered around each instructor. Ample
time was allotted for questions and more focused discussions.
Classmates agreed that the CSA Growers School covered a lot
of ground in the intensive session and provided a solid overview
of the current state of the art of CSA in the Northeast. 
Steve Gilman is a long time organic farmer and organic
farming writer, with a special interest in CSA.
.
|