| The instructor who would spend the
next eight hours teaching us about wind energy had each of us make
a fist and imagine a lump of coal about that size. Now consider 1,000
of those lumps, he said, and you have about 1,000 pounds of coal—the
amount necessary to produce 1,000 kilowatt hours (kwh) of electricity
and the average amount of energy consumed by a 2,000 square-foot residential
Wisconsin home each month. (One kilowatt hour equals the amount of
electrical energy consumed when 1,000 watts are used for one hour.)
Each pound of coal burned, he added, releases two pounds of carbon
dioxide—a major greenhouse gas—into the atmosphere.
For more than 20 years, Mick Sagrillo has worked as a wind energy
advocate, educator, and entrepreneur. In 1983, he founded Michigan
Wind & Sun, LTD, a company that makes wind generator components
and towers, refurbishes and repairs wind equipment, and installs
wind energy systems. He’s widely published on the subject
of wind technology and is a founding member of the Midwest Renewable
Energy Association.
In late February, Sagrillo came to Organic University, the prequel
to the Upper Midwest Organic Farming Conference in La Crosse, Wisconsin,
to show us how and why this clean and renewable energy source makes
sense on the farm.
Coal-generated electricity accounts for about 40 percent all manmade
carbon dioxide emissions released into the atmosphere. And, although
it represents less than 5 percent of the global population, the
United States is responsible for about 30 percent of all planetary
greenhouse gas emissions. Consider a country such as Denmark or
Germany, where up to 70 percent of electricity is wind generated,
Sagrillo told us. Though those countries are about half the size
of Wisconsin, he said, “There are 53 [electricity generating]
windmills in Wisconsin; there are more than 2,000 in Denmark. We’ve
got a long way to go in this country.”
Greenhouse gas emissions aren’t the only problem, Sagrillo
said; 50 percent of the mercury now polluting our lakes and rendering
fish toxic to eat rains down upon us from coal being burned to make
electricity.
Dollars and Sense
“Efficiency is not squandering resources,” Sagrillo
said as he explained the economic advantages of investing up-front
in energy saving devices such as compact fluorescent light bulbs,
good insulation and double-pane window. “Each dollar spent
on efficiency will save you $3 to $5 dollars in system costs.”
So now that you’ve got your home super-insulated and all
your household and farm appliances are geared toward maximum efficiency,
it’s time to harness the power of the wind. Basically, lift
created by the movement of air turns a windmill’s rotor blades—typically
there are three of them—which drive a generator, which produces
electricity. “The bigger the rotor, the more wind you can
collect,” Sagrillo explained. (And the more time-consuming
and expensive to maintain, he added.)
Sagrillo defined three basic categories of residential/farm wind
machinery. What he termed the “cabin” size, a 1-kilowatt
(kW) system with rotor blades about make this 8 to 11feet in diameter
and the capacity to generate 30 to 100 kilowatt hours of electricity
per month; “These are relatively small machines…about
45 pounds,” Sagrillo said. “You can literally throw
them on your back, climb up the tower and stick it up there.”
The “home” size, a 3kW to 6kW system with a rotor blade
diameter of 12 to 18 feet generating anywhere from 250-800 kwh of
electricity monthly. And the “small farm” size—10kW
to 65kW systems with rotors spanning 22 feet or more in diameter,
and with the capacity to generate upwards of 2,500 kwh of electricity
per month.
According to a cost-estimate spreadsheet Sagrillo passed out to
the class, up-front costs for these larger systems—including
the tower and all installation costs—can range anywhere from
around $10,000 for a system that can generate around 100 kwh monthly,
to just over $50,000 for a system capable of generating 2,500 kwh
monthly. (Key variables such as tower height and average wind speed—which
will be covered in Part II of this series—will factor heavily
in actual performance.
The good news about these mid-sized systems is that there is a
growing supply of fully refurbished units to meet a growing demand.
“We’re just now seeing a redirection of these types
of turbines in places like California,” Sagrillo said. “In
California, [the utility companies] are taking out the smaller turbines
and putting in the behemoths…and they’re finding a niche
for this 20 year old equipment.”
That niche includes farmers and others.
“A school district in Spirit Lake, Iowa put up a 65kW turbine
and expected payback in seven or eight years,” Sagrillo told
us. “They paid for it in two years.”
These recycled units are being remanufactured and put back on the
streets with essentially the same warranty as new equipment, Sagrillo
said, adding that “there are reputable remanufactures and
disreputable ones—what we call Rustoleum rebuilds.”
Sagrillo counseled anyone considering a second-hand unit to do their
homework before making a purchase.
“A 65kW system, installed, will cost in the neighborhood
of $85,000 to $90,000; a machine like this will do 65,000 to 85,000
kwh a year, depending on where you’re at.”
Economies of scale (and cooperation)
“As you go up in size, the cost of the electricity that you
generate goes down,” Sagrillo informs us.
Of course, the bigger the unit, the more complex; hence, the increased
maintenance investment. “Smaller units, up to about 10kW,
are direct drive,” Sagrillo said. “Over 10kW, they are
pretty much all gear driven.”
The next step up from a 65kW system is a doozie; about 10 times
the size, at 660kW. Now we are talking 75-foot blades on a 206-foot
tower. And even this Brontosaurus of the windmill world is becoming
somewhat of a dinosaur for utility companies because it is too small.
The price tag on one of these units installed as new equipment?
Around $1.2 million.
Though a relatively new concept in North America, Sagrillo said,
cooperative purchase of such large-scale wind machinery is commonplace
elsewhere. “This is old hat in Denmark…less than 10
percent [of the country’s 2,000 windmills] are owned by utilities—they’re
owned by the people.”
Sagrillo told us about a project near Toronto Ontario, Canada,
where a non-profit choreographed the purchase of one of these huge
machines and sold shares to local residents. “Over the 20-year
life of the turbine, [investors] get a check on a regular basis;
they’re getting back between 7- and 8-percent return on investment.”
The beauty of cooperative investment in wind energy, Sagrillo said,
is that you don’t necessarily have to have a windy site to
participate. “But we don’t do things like co-ops very
well in this country; the business model in this country is everybody
for themselves and everybody else be damned. It’s not the
best business model.”
Getting technical
Wind machines fall into two basic categories, Sagrillo said.
“Drag devices work by the wind literally blowing something
out of the way,” he said, giving the examples of those quaint-looking
water pumpers that are ubiquitous across the rural landscape. The
drag concept has been around for nearly 3,000 years and is not the
most efficient use of wind power, Sagrillo said. “These do
an extremely good job of pumping water; they do a lousy job of generating
electricity.”
Lift devices work very much like, and resemble, airplane wings,
Sagrillo said. “Lift literally causes these blades to be pulled
forward similarly to the way that an airplane is moved through the
atmosphere. We’re basically taking big chunks of moving air
and we’re converting it to rotational momentum to turn an
electrical generator.”
Another way to visualize this concept, Sagrillo said, is to imagine
dense, high-pressure air molecules under the wing or in front of
the rotor blade displacing low-pressure, more scattered molecules
above the wing or behind the rotor blade, thus creating lift.
Electricity is produced when coils of wire inside the generator
create a pulse as they move through a magnetic field, Sagrillo said.
The faster the turbines turn, he said, the faster the pulse and
the more electricity produced. Gear-driven turbines enhance this
efficiency, he said, because the generator spins six to 18 times
for every single revolution of the blades.
Smaller, direct-driven wind-energy systems typically have a tail
to keep them oriented toward the wind. These uncomplicated systems
are ideal for homeowners, Sagrillo said, because they are easy to
maintain and homeowners have a reputation for letting things go.
“They’re relatively simple machines,” he said.
“A gearbox is a level of complexity that you add to a turbine
that a lot of people can’t deal with,” Sagrillo said.
But equipment maintenance is a reality of farming, he said. “Every
time you add a moving part, two things happen. There’s a reduction
in efficiency as energy is dissipated in heat. And there’s
considerable more maintenance. The maintenance issue is why windfarm
equipment and industrial equipment is so different.”
Then there is dealing with the factor of too much wind.
“The blades on a direct-drive turbine are literally bolted
into place; the problem is that, at some point, the wind is going
to get too strong for this machine and we’ve got to get rid
of it,” Sagrillo said. “One of the ways we can do this
is by pitching the blades.”
Pitching the blades— turning them out of the wind’s
way—is accomplished through a few different methods, Sagrillo
said. In the most basic design, a tension spring connecting the
shaft of the blade to a central spider gives way under a certain
amount of force. “It’s simple, reliable, and cost-effective.”
More complex systems utilize hydraulics and computers. This sophisticated
design is more typical of large-scale windfarm machinery, he said.
Rather than having a tail to guide them, these mammoth machines—which
are typically sited upwind—take their cues from a computer
linked to a 3-cup anemometer (to measure wind speed) and a wind
vane (to measure wind direction). “A motor moves the blades
around until they are facing back into the wind.”
“You can also pitch the entire rotor upwards or sideways,”
Sagrillo said, explaining that this is accomplished with the aid
of an offset pivot. (This is how smaller residential wind equipment
typically is protected from high winds.)
With all these incredible advances in clean energy technology,
why so many environment-choking coal-burning plants online and planned
for the future?
“Elecricity is the most frequently-bought product in the
United States; there’s nothing we consume more and with more
regularity than electricity.” That unfortunately, Sagrillo
said, means huge subsidies, gigantic campaign contributions, and
preserving the big-business status quo.
Dan Sullivan is senior editor at The New Farm. Mick Sagrillo
is owner of Sagrillo Power and light, a Wisconsin-based consulting
firm specializing in home-sized wind-turbine technology and educational
workshops.
|