|
November 9, 2004: The word “agriculture”
evokes certain pictures that vary with the individual. A short drive
outside of Chicago, fields and fields of corn or soybeans evoke
one image. Barns and cows conjure up another. In more progressive
circles, agriculture may mean food and small family farmers living
close to the land.
Urban agriculture topples the myth that food production has to
occur in wide-open spaces on large tracts of land. In fact, urban
agriculture flies in the face of what usually has been done (and
shown to be possible) in urban communities. Urban agriculture is
part of a growing trend toward locally produced food, knowing where
food comes from and who grew it.
Urban agriculture has been around for centuries. In 16th century
Peru, a self-reliant urban agricultural system thrived in the Andes
mountain city Machu Picchu. In 19th century France, biointensive
agriculture fed local communities in urban centers.
Urban agriculture is about feeding people; it embraces the rights
of farmers to produce food and the right of community to choose
what they want to eat. Urban agriculture also embraces the concept
of food sovereignty, a concept developed by Vía Campesina
and introduced at the World Food Summit in Rome in 1996.
At a follow-up summit five years later, a group of NGOs described
food sovereignty as “the right of peoples, communities, and
countries to define their own agricultural, labor, fishing, food,
and land policies which are ecologically, socially, economically,
and culturally appropriate to their unique circumstances....”
Food sovereignty introduces a complete integration of social justice
ideals that do not begin and end with food production but take into
account every aspect of the system. It favors local food for local
communities over food produced for import or export.
Bring it on home
My involvement in urban agriculture began with a simple wish to
feed my son a healthy diet. After learning of his severe food allergies,
I started to research the potential connection to food. I wanted
to better understand what the proper diet for a 2 year old who was
allergic to peanuts, shellfish, eggs, cheese and milk would look
like! My research led me to the conclusion that the best diet for
my son, and my whole family, would be a whole-foods diet with as
little processed, packaged food included as possible.
Not realizing that I was asking a big question, I stumbled across
some articles that mentioned genetically modified (GMO) food. However,
when I examined food labels, no mention of GMOs could be found.
How could this happen, and why was I not made aware of this? As
I read further, I found out about industrial agriculture and all
of its hazards. I was not prepared for the revelation that I knew
very little about where my food came from or who grew it. Prior
to this incident with my son, I would not have even considered the
fact healthy and nutritious food has a lot to do with how that food
was produced.
Closing in on a solution proved more difficult. Wallowing in the
“industrial agriculture in the country needs to change”
mentality did not get the food on the table in my Westside Chicago
neighborhood. I needed to gain access to food unpolluted by genetic
engineering and free from pesticides. I needed organic food. Organic
was not a new word to me; I had been exposed to the concept at the
Midwestern college I attended. There were a few organic vegetable
items in the local store—I remember the grey tinge on some
carrots. They were not very appealing and hardly local.
My search for organic food in Chicago took me to grocery stores
all over the city. On one of my long shopping excursions, I was
disheartened to discover that I could not grocery shop in my own
neighborhood. There was only one grocery store, and it did not carry
organic food. On a visit to the produce section, I was shocked to
find Boston lettuce at $3 a pound and heirloom tomatoes at $4.99
per pound. I quickly realized that we could scarcely afford organic
food. I also wondered just how much effort it would it take to grow
some lettuce and a couple of tomatoes (little did I know the ultimate
ramifications of that simple question).
After some more research, my husband and I decided to convert our
backyard into what we called a “micro-farm.” My in-laws,
who grew up on farms in rural areas, offered technical assistance.
We grew lettuce, tomatoes, peas, squash, greens, cabbage, onions and
a few herbs.
Then I decided to plant some corn. My father-in-law, Mr. Willie,
looked amazed and proclaimed with authority, “That’s
not going to grow.” I asked him why, and he responded matter-of-factly,
“Corn won’t grow here in Chicago.”
Illinois is the leading state in soybean production and the second
leading state in corn. One out of every four jobs in Illinois is
agriculturally related. This is the Corn Belt. Surely, I thought,
I can grow corn in Chicago. In defiance, I planted my kernels. I
learned a lot about corn and planted two varieties, one hybrid and
the other a native. The hybrid took; the native variety did not.
I learned a new word: tassel. The tassel on the corn had to pollinate
the silk, otherwise no corn will grow. Imagine that! I had no idea!
One of my fellow gardeners told me to go out and gently shake my
corn plants. Wacky as it sounded, I went out and shook all 20 of
my corn stalks. By late August, Mr. Willie was the first to tell
me that my corn was ready to pick. My husband, Tracey, had become
a willing and even enthusiastic participant in this urban garden
experiment. One day out of the blue, Tracey declared that he wanted
to farm. Reluctant to give up all I knew about urban life, I looked
around and saw that we could farm right where we were.
Sharing the wealth
Chicago is home to an estimated 70,000 vacant parcels of land.
Mayor Richard M. Daley harbors a dream of creating the greenest
city in the U.S. Well on his way to being the green mayor, Daley
has developed a number of innovative environmental projects, including
a roof-top garden on City Hall (where, of course, it’s always
good to have a friend).
Urban farming and rural farming share some similarities. One, of
course, is the goal to grow a product for consumption. The fundamental
difference between urban agriculture and rural farming is land,
specifically, the way in which that is acquired. Urban options include
partnership with a municipal agency to gain access or outright purchase.
The latter can prove to be very expensive, as land values in urban
centers such Chicago are relatively costly. The lots that we acquire
through our nonprofit, the Institute for Community Resource Development,
we held in a trust by an organization called Neighborspace. Neighborspace
holds the title to lots, and we have a management agreement for
site usage.
As we developed the process to convert vacant lots to urban farm
sites, supporting the local economy was a central theme. To achieve
that end, we decided to at least try to use the time and talent
of local community members as we developed the project. One of the
ways the farm has consistently contributed to the local economy
has been through hiring folks in our community to work on the farm
sites. This work has included anything from short-term contracting,
such as renting a Bobcat and hiring a driver to move compost, to
hiring someone to plant and harvest vegetables for market.
As hard as we try, sometimes it isn’t possible to get everything
from the community. In those cases, we have been able to identify
other community based organizations to help us achieve our local
economy goals. The inputs that make our vacant lots suitable to
growing healthy produce are similar to those used to turn around
abused farmland; they are simply applied in different quantities.
To begin, we purchase good-quality compost by the truckload from
a local urban farmer, Ken Dunn, director of the Resource Center.
The Resource Center collects vegetable waste from local restaurants
and turns it into compost. In the Chicago area, Dunn is known as
the father of urban agriculture.
Before we could use the compost for the farm sites, we had to break
up the heavily compacted soil. This could not be accomplished with
a tiller; we used a backhoe to get the job done. The owner of the
backhoe is a community member who owns a construction company.
University resources came in handy when figuring how to lay out
the beds on the lots. An Extension agent from the University of
Illinois helped us identify suitable plant varieties and with spacing.
Because our project is done organically, we turned to local organic
market producers to help with pest management and production. David
Cleverton of Kinnikinnick Farms helped a lot by donating a couple
of hundred tomato seedlings and then coming out to the urban farm
sites to help us plant them.
We now have six lots and a refrigerated truck, and my husband Tracey
is well on his way to realizing his dream of becoming a full-time
farmer.
As we began working with urban agriculture, we realized that while
the organic issue was important to us; locally grown, accessible
food was even more so. Learning that our community was somewhat
of a “food desert” was a real eye opener. There was
very limited access to quality produce such as organic. That our
community did not desire this type of food was one of the many myths
we shattered along our journey; that our neighbors were largely
uneducated was another. Supporting the local Austin Farmes' Market
has been another way to build up the local economy.
The urban farm has inspired us to provide healthy, local, and sustainable
food choices not only for our family but for our entire neighborhood.
The food that we grow on the urban farm sites is sold at local farmers'
markets and, seasonally of course, at the neighborhood corner grocery
store.
As we attempt to connect the food production of urban and rural
communities, we see an opportunity to not choose urban over rural
but to create a connection that highlights the value of both environments.
“Creating a systems approach related to urban agriculture
is important,” says Orrin Williams, founder and president
of the Center for Urban Transformation. (Williams is an environmental
justice activist who has worked to close down toxic polluters on
the West Side of Chicago.) “Urban agriculture cannot exist
in a vacuum,” he says.
“This project goes beyond mere gardening because the intent
is to look at the comprehensive approach to the issue of developing
local economies—hiring locally, selling locally. Using a food-system
paradigm, we can see clearly how urban agriculture can improve access
to high-quality food in communities like Austin.”
LaDonna Redmond is president of the Institute for Community
Resource Development, a member of the Illinois Governor’s
Advisory Council on Agriculture and Family Farms, and a 2003 Kellogg
Foundation Food and Society Fellow.
|