|
Posted January 12, 2006: With the continued growth
of organics, it was only a matter of time before an agricultural
school in North America created an academic major in organic agriculture.
The surprise is that it happened in a leading ag-biotech research
school that had its share of organic detractors and a small core
of faculty familiar with organic farming disciplines.
The Ontario Agricultural College at the University of Guelph (Ontario)
has its first students in their first of four years in pursuit of
a bachelor of science (agriculture) major in organic agriculture.
A Canadian education site says Guelph “is Canada’s innovative
leader in plant and animal life-sciences and a premier centre for
agri-food, biotechnology and environmental research, education and
outreach.”
Within this environment, faculty members had tried and failed in
the past to institute a major embracing of organics. But with the
persistence of a well-known organic advocate as well as the blessing
in 2003 of a new dean, Guelph’s new program developed from
within the department. This is relatively unusual, as most organic
programs develop rather tangentially to standard ag offerings.
“It has never been done intentionally from the inside,”
says E. Ann Clark, PhD, the professor who was the go-to person for
the dean, Craig Pearson. “That’s what distinguishes
this degree. It was done with the blessing of our dean, and it’s
fabricated from within by faculty.” The collaborative process
across a mix of agricultural perspectives makes the new major academically
rigorous, she says.
Clark specializes in pasture and grazing management, organic farming
and GMOs.
Major resistance overcome
While Clark and others point to how incredibly supportive the
administration has been about the major, this was not the case as
recently as 2001. The former dean was more sympathetic to the concerns
of traditional faculty members, many of whom were at best cynical
-- and at worst hostile -- to the work of Clark and others on sustainable
agriculture.
Clark is well-known in the U.S. and Canada for her outspoken views
on agricultural biotechnology and sustainability issues. She’s
ready to move on with creating a strong department and feels the
conflict over creating an organic major has been pretty well worked
through. While many conventional agriculture professors were reluctant,
some might have accepted the value of an organic major as, if nothing
else, a public relations tool. Regardless of why, the support is
now there.
That grassroots pressure to start the course came from the true
roots of any university: the students. Seven years ago, 350 undergrads
signed a petition that spurred – against some opposition –
creation of “Crop 3400: Introduction to Organic Agriculture.”
Clark says her overview of programs in the U.S. and Canada showed
initiatives in sustainable ag or agroecology typically come from
either student or farmer demand.
The roots of Clark’s role as the dynamic force that pulled
the major together go back to 2002. That autumn, she gave a plenary
talk with graduate student Jacinda Fairholm at the 2002 IFOAM (International
Federation of Organic Movements) conference in Victoria, B.C. Looking
for models in organic education, they surveyed 25 programs -- 15
in Canada, and 10 in the U.S. -- as well as 10 experiential programs.
Much to their surprise, they learned that not a single one of these
schools had an actual academic major in organic agriculture.
Clark vowed at that time that organic agricultural education had
to have a strong link with organic farmers to be true to the principles
of knowing the land, biodiversity, passing on agricultural wisdom
and experiential learning.
Drawing new kinds of student
The program Clark designed from her research and student contact
is not aimed at your usual “aggie” profile of being
farm-raised. Most will come from other worlds. Clark has found that
there are more women involved with organic agriculture. Many interested
students are more culturally and politically progressive and have
more environmental concerns than conventional farm students. Having
many students with no farm background whatsoever poses new challenges
and opportunities.
“The way agriculture has traditionally been, you didn’t
worry how to lube a tractor or birth a calf or whatever because
the students already knew it, but now they don’t,” Clark
finds. Yet she is also going about giving the hands-on experience
in a different way than the typical school farm.
“I’m about convinced that organic systems are ‘interactions-based,’
in that the determinants of how a given crop grows are a 500-way
interaction among all sorts of factors making the ‘whole’
a very site-specific phenomenon,” Clark says. So anything
learned by a student body on a campus farm, while useful, may be
of little relevance to the farm they start up in a different region
with largely variant conditions. Until specialized spaces suitable
for organics come about, Guelph’s organic program relies heavily
upon the local organic farm community, which, according to Clark,
is “arguably a better and more grounded way to learn.”
One option open to all Guelph students interested in organic farm
internships is Ontario’s CRAFT – the Collaborative Regional
Alliance for Farmer Training. It links interns on organic farms
for shared experiences on member operations. Interns take monthly
farm field trips with tours and workshops. Students see different
farms, different methods, and everyone – including some of
the farmers – learns more than they would in internship isolation.
Farm experience critical
Heather Lekx is the CSA and internship coordinator at Ignatius
Farm, located minutes from campus on the edge of Guelph. Kaitlin
Kazmierowski and Amy Thorne attended Guelph, took Clark’s
“Introduction to Organic Agriculture” course, and spent
a summer working the fields at Ignatius Farm. Kazmierowski, an environmental
science major, grew up in Toronto. She had no interest in agriculture
whatsoever until taking Clark’s course, but now she’s
hooked. What is most compelling is her sense that organic agriculture
education has given her a new perspective on the critical role of
food in our world.

 |
|
“I see cities and there is so much wasted space that can
be used to make the city beautiful,” Kazmierowski said. “People
are just getting more and more cut off. If people could provide
[food] for themselves, they would find it is pretty empowering to
grow something and to eat it, and say, ‘I did this; I made
this happen.’ I think everyone should have a hand in seeing
how food is produced, because people take it for granted.”
Amy Thorne is from a non-farm background in Ottawa. After enjoying
her first internship at Ignatius Farm, she plans to do another internship
this year. “If you are really interested in the environment,
[producing food] is one of the first things you can do if you want
to create healthy communities.”
Future looks brighter
Clark is optimistic about organic ag education’s potential
impact, despite structural barriers to its success. One hurdle is
that organic expertise is virtually all non-proprietary, so there
is very little business-driven money coming in to fund the needed
academic research positions to create more organic curriculum. Two,
the non-organic agricultural input industry has a vested interest
in making sure the public doesn’t accept organics, which depend
on knowledge of sustainable systems more than products.
“That industry is basically addressing symptom-oriented problems,”
Clark says. “Roundup deals in symptoms. If Roundup actually
worked at the causal end it would put Monsanto out of business within
a year. All the solutions that they are selling -- whether they
are genetic or chemical or managerial -- are all symptom-oriented
solutions, and they must be specifically so the cause will not be
reduced.”
With elevated petroleum costs a factor, Clark calls for a “new
agriculture” template where the currently externalized environmental
and societal costs are added to the budget sheet. When the bigger
picture is in the economic equation, organic agriculture offers
a better paradigm. Organic agricultural training will have to factor
in these changes, adapting to grapple with increasing consumer demand
for healthy food and a sound ecosystem.
Will organic educators and farmers be up to the challenge?
“Well, I think we are following, we are not leading society,”
says Clark. “And I think that’s not a bad thing.”

|