| June 15, 2007:
Three groups based in Nebraska have released a consensus document
to guide farmers and consumers in the safe producing and handling
of raw milk.
The “Raw Milk Use and Safety Fact Sheet” emphasizes
the need for open communication between farmers and consumers. It
lays out the history of milk pasteurization, the universe of possible
milk-borne pathogens and the respective roles of animal husbandry
and sanitary handling for obtaining safe raw milk with optimal human
benefits.
The 16-page report opens with a science module on pasteurization
and the composition of cow’s milk, then follows with modules
for dairy farmers and raw-milk consumers. Nearly half the report
lists citations of scientific, regulatory and technical publications.
Discussion during and following the National Raw Milk Use and Safety
Summit in May, 2006, in Norfolk, Nebraska, contributed to the report.
Involved were farmer and consumer groups, with attendance also by
public economic planning and educational representatives.
Authoring the piece were Martin Kleinschmit of the Center for Rural
Affairs of Hartington; a representative from the Northeast Nebraska
Resource Conservation and Development; and Terry Gompert of Center,
Nebraska, a Holistic Management Certified Educator.
The authors say the purpose of the fact sheet is to:
- Assure that raw milk marketed and used will be safe
- Assist educators and regulators to encourage appropriate raw-milk
use
- Enhance research investments into raw-milk production and use
in beneficial ways
- Educate consumers on the difference between milk intended for
sale as raw milk and the commercially processed milk found in
the store, and the impacts of pasteurization and homogenization
on milk.
Major points in the fact sheet include:
- “Pasteurization not only kills bad bacteria and pathogens,
but also kills beneficial bacteria and destroys enzymes.”
This includes the enzymes phosphatase, essential in the absorption
of calcium, and lipase, which aids in the digestion of fats. It
also alters proteins and reduces the levels of Vitamins A, C,
E, D and F.
- “Most conventionally produced milk from confined cows
should still be properly pasteurized to reduce potential disease
outbreaks.” The report notes that in recent University of
California Davis tests, 31 percent of raw milk samples taken from
farm tanks of conventional milk intended for pasteurization contained
detectible human pathogens. Mixing of this milk for processing
would cause contamination of the entire lot, making pasteurization
a necessary step for this type of milk.
- “What the cow eats affects the milk quality. Milk quality
includes many things—fats, minerals, vitamins, enzymes,
flavor and more. If the cow’s diet is primarily forage from
green, growing pastures, her milk will contain more conjugated
linoleic acid (CLA), increased vitamins and minerals, and slightly
higher levels of omega 3 fatty acids.”
Summary points on milk pathogens include:
- Pathogens in milk are in-part the result of poor sanitation,
animal stress and animal sickness
- On-farm milk testing can be done in a timely and economical
manner: consider on farm testing, independent laboratory testing
and Grade-A testing
- Raw-milk standards should be superior to traditional milk supply
- The consumer should be comfortable with the farmer and husbandry
practices.
Testing, cleanliness and prompt cooling of milk are emphasized
in the farmer module, along with counsel for herd-health management
and opening testing records to customers. Customers are advised
to understand how to handle raw milk safely and to consult professionals
with family health concerns. Both farmers and consumers should continue
to learn about milk safety and work to improve.
For hard copies or an electronic PDF file of the report, contact
Terry Gompert, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension in Knox
County, P.O. Box 45, Center NE 68724, (402) 288-5611, fax (402)
288-5612, knox-county@unl.edu.
To view the fact sheet, click
here.

|