| MOSCOW, Idaho,
posted July 29, 2005: Clean air and clean water
are historically championed as prime environmental initiatives.
Now Claudia Hemphill, a doctoral student in environmental
science at the University of Idaho, is "cleaning
up" the environmental philosophy of dirt.
Hemphill, one of the first in the nation to research
cultural perception of soil, asserts it’s important
to understand the environment scientifically and culturally.
She contends that Americans have ingrained negative
connotations about dirt, which minimize concerns about
what people do to dirt and how they care for it. This
careless attitude leads to deterioration of soil quality,
as the soil gets overworked and large amounts of chemicals
are used to eliminate pests and weeds.
Hemphill believes the Leonardo da Vinci statement,
“We know more about the motions of the universe
than the soil beneath our feet.”
“Science has a hard time studying soil –
it’s extremely complex,” she said. “The
millions of species living in it are mainly microscopic,
and most of them can’t even be cultured in a laboratory
dish. Science has been geared toward studying things
that can be isolated in a laboratory and identified
– like an animal species or an atomic element.”
“If you take a sample of water from the stream
and filter out the leaf bits and twigs, insects and
impurities, you’re left with pure water,”
said Hemphill. “If you take a handful of soil
and remove the rock particles, pollen grains, decomposing
wood bits, water and microorganisms, you’re left
with nothing. Philosophically, this makes it cognitively
unmanageable because it bypasses our tendency to want
to sort things out into little piles that are all the
same.
Using her extensive background in anthropology and philosophy,
she has studied different cultures in-depth and found
that soil came to be identified with things that fade
and die. As society became richer and more urban, soil
was identified with people who were rural and of a lower
social-economic class. In the United States, the span
of 100 years saw a population composed of mostly farmers
become 95 percent urban.
“As public health was increasingly important in
these new, densely populated cities, just about everything
from swamp gas to house dust was accused of being the
evil source of disease,” said Hemphill. “One
of the biggest public health campaign slogans around
the turn of the century was “Dirt, Disease and
Death.”
“So dirt became the major symbol of disease,”
said Hemphill. “Anyone who was considered socially
inferior – such as immigrants or different ethnic
groups – was called dirty. Dirtiness was a huge
insult. Housecleaning became an obsession. Even outdoors,
dirt is eliminated – backyards are turned into
concrete patios or covered up with gravel or bark-mulch.
Dirt is so intrinsically bad, we don’t even want
to see it outdoors.”
Studies by numerous medical researchers, from Oregon
Health Sciences University to the Royal Free and University
College Medical School in London, now find that children
are more likely to develop asthma and allergies from
cleaning chemicals than from household dust and dirt
in the yard. In fact, it appears that just being exposed
to dirt as a child is essential to developing a healthy
immune system. Just as with vaccinations, the minute
exposure children get to a wide range of environmental
organisms through playing in the dirt triggers the development
of their antibody levels.
“From a medical point of view,” said Hemphill,
“the dirt that 100 years ago was turned into the
popular symbol of all disease turns out to be essential
for building resistance to disease. We need to have
some dirt in our lives.”
Hemphill is taking a hands-on approach to her philosophy.
As a graduate student leader, she is part of campus-wide
sustainability initiatives such as Soil Stewards, the
organic farming club she helped start.
“It’s about maintaining the soil,”
said Hemphill. “We feed the soil, the soil feeds
the plants and the plants feed the people. It’s
about developing sustainable food systems and teaching
others how to become environmentally sustainable.
“One of the ways that people come to change their
attitudes toward other people or to the environment
is through education. But just learning more about something
doesn’t make you care about what happens to it,
or change the way you behave. So a large part of changing
people’s perceptions toward soil is becoming involved
with it.”
She would know. The produce that Soil Stewards has grown
over the last two years has been purchased and used
by both UI and Washington State University’s dining
services. The club continues to grow, bringing together
students, faculty and community groups from different
disciplines, including environmental sciences, natural
resources, engineering, business and communications.
Hemphill’s research, and the national ideas developed
from it, could change perceptions of Americans for generations
to come. For now, Hemphill is satisfied that the organic
mustard grown by Soil Stewards on UI’s research
farm had comparable yields last year to the local mustard
grown in conventional ways. To her, it means they’re
doing something right and is the start of great things
to come.
“Soil is where life begins and ends, where natural
ecosystems keep going,” she said. “‘Save
the environment’ doesn’t just mean air and
water – it means saving all of it. Civilization
depends on soil, so we need to adjust our relationship
with soil and learn how to keep this natural life cycle
going.”
. |