November 26, 2004, ARS
News Service: An organic crop rotation is at least as sustainable
as no-till farming or chisel tillage in terms of nitrogen loss and
corn yields, according to an Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
study. The five-year study showed that a three-year rotation of
organic corn, soybeans, wheat and a legume cover crop had nitrogen
losses and corn yields similar to those on land where either chisel-tillage
or no-till farming had been used.
The organic rotation relied on poultry litter, soybeans and a hairy
vetch legume cover crop as nitrogen sources. The study showed the
highest risk of leaching nitrogen to groundwater was on fields with
no-till or chisel tillage where both commercial fertilizer and poultry
litter had been used. Future studies are planned to measure or estimate
leaching losses.
Michel Cavigelli, an ARS soil scientist at the Henry A. Wallace
Beltsville (Md.) Agricultural Research Center, and Steve Green,
an ARS soil scientist research associate, are studying nitrogen
losses with organic and other farming systems. The study is part
of a farming systems project begun in 1996 to compare the sustainability
of organic and conventional farming. Minimizing losses of nitrogen
and other nutrients is a key element of both environmental and economic
sustainability.
Cavigelli and Green used measurements and estimates to get an initial
picture of nitrogen inputs and losses. They are conducting additional
studies to improve their ability to more accurately estimate the
amount of nitrogen added naturally by soybean plants.
The scientists got their poultry litter--both composted and noncomposted--from
commercial farms on Maryland's Eastern Shore. They studied corn-soybean
rotations, mostly with winter wheat, using various levels of tillage.
Green presented this research at the American Society of Agronomy's
recent annual meeting in Seattle, Wash., along with a report on
the risk of phosphorus loss from erosion. He found the risk of losing
phosphorus from soil erosion was similar for both the organic system
and land that was chisel-plowed, but the risk was lower with a conventional
no-till system.
|